![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
|
The
following are extracts from printed articles which you can read in full
where there is a link indicated. Inside Housing Cambridge
two case is too close to home In your article 'Wyner case is no cause for alarm' (Inside Housing, 23 June), drugs tsar Keith Hellawell is quoted as saying: 'To my knowledge, this is the only case of this nature - if there were similar cases, people would be worried.' On the contrary, people around the country are already extremely worried because the convictions provide not just a precedent, but confusion. Nobody knows what will make them safe from similar prosecutions. As one homeless manager said to me: 'I am just as guilty as Ruth or John, because it's impossible to do my job - working with drug addicts - and not be. I've already committed their crime twice this morning.' Please click here for more details
Joy
as charity pair bailed Two
charity managers jailed for allowing drugs to be peddled at a drop-in
centre for the homeless were yesterday freed on bail pending their appeal
against the conviction.
John Brock has found it hard to cope with the daily separation from his wife and two children. He has been suffering from depression and his dose of Prozac has recently been increased as he struggles to face being parted from his wife Louise and two sons Lloyd, 16 and Dylan, 11. (John explained...) "For me it was not a matter of not being able to take the situation in, it was the reality that became too difficult to bear. "I saw years stretching in front of me, with the same routine every day. I really never thought I would go to prison... ..."I could not believe it in court when they said we 'knowingly permitted' heroin to be supplied".
Paul Boateng has rejected Mrs Campbell's arguments during the report stage of the bill. (Cambridge MP Anne Campbell had tabled an amendment to a government bill to help protect charity staff working with drugs). He said: "If reasonable steps are taken to deal with the problem and there is no action to condone, encourage or turn a blind eye, the offence is not committed." Mr Boateng said he believed the Cambridge Two were the first care agency staff to be prosecuted under the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act. He added: "The fact that only one prosecution has been brought shows there is not a widespread problem of care activity being inhibited by ill-founded prosecutions, accusations and convictions in the area." The government is considering issuing new guidelines to charities on anti-drug measures, although it does not intend to change the law.
Cambridge
Two are not alone Over
half of the hostel workers trained by drug advice body Release since January
could fall foul of the same laws that saw two day centre managers imprisoned
on drugs charges.
Cambridge
MP Anne Campbell has tabled an amendment to a government bill to help
protect charity staff working with drugs - but her move stands little
chance of becoming law.
Prisoner
of Conscience In this exclusive interview, John Brock, jailed for 'allowing' drug dealing at the wintercomfort homeless drop-in centre, speaks out from prison for the first time. Lloyd
was finishing his breakfast when the doorbell rang. It was a man and a
woman. They were looking for a Mr John Brock. The 14-year-old said his
dad was asleep upstairs and offered them a cup of tea while they waited.
A third visitor arrived through the open back door and Lloyd, in a rush
to get ready for school, shouted up for his mum. Within five minutes the
three CID officers had arrested John Brock and were escorting him out
of the house to the police station.
Families
of jailed charity workers appeal to Straw Children of two charity workers jailed for allowing the supply of heroin at the day centre they ran, handed a petition to the Home Secretary yesterday, asking for them to be freed pending appeal.
The
Untouchables Two people are in prison because of drug offences. They did not deal drugs or use them. The charge was 'having knowingly permitted or suffered' the sale of illegal drugs on premises that they managed. The fact that they were working to help people with drug addictions and other problems was not enough. They, according to the law, should have turned those people in.
Five
years: is that what you get for helping people? Bus
staff are struggling to accept that Wyner, "a brilliant director", and
Brock, "utterly anti-drugs", are locked up. Supporters campaigning for
their release insist that Wyner and Brock have been punished for their
unflagging work with a difficult, and not always grateful, social group,
backed by slender resources. Charities argue that, subjected to similar
police scrutiny, their staff could also be jailed. Of particular concern
was Judge Haworth's refusal to accept that client confidentiality - essential
in winning the trust of the homeless, of whom up to 70 per cent are estimated
to take drugs - prevented Wyner from giving police the names of people
banned from Bus on suspicion of dealing. Bus staff claim that Cambridgeshire
police, "buoyed up" by the outcome of the case, are now pushing them to
become "casual contacts" - a euphemism for informers.
Top
comedian joins growing support for the Cambridge Two Controversial
comedian Mark Thomas is to highlight the conviction of Cambridge homeless
charity workers Ruth Wyner and John Brock on his television show. The
latest episode of his TV show - The Mark Thomas Product - will see four
supporters of the jailed Wintercomfort bosses turn themselves in at Parkside
police station. Prof David Brandon and Linda Bendall, members of the Cambridge
Two Action Committee, are among the quartet who tell police they are guilty
of the same offences which sent the pair to prison, and ask to be arrested.
Cold
Comfort Ruth and John were charged under Section 8 of the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act, which makes it illegal for someone to allow drug dealing on their premises… …Section 8 of the Misuse of Drugs Act was never, legal experts aver, intended for this purpose. It was meant to draw under the powers of the Act those people who profit from allowing their premises - nightclub, bar, opium den - to be used for drug dealing. There was no question that Ruth and John were involved in the dealing, nor that they received money from the dealers.
...thanks to an overzealous interpretation by police, peosecutors and Judge Jonathan Howarth - Cambridge's answer to hanging Judge Jeffries - charity workers Ruth Wyner and John Brock have been jailed for a staggering five and four years apiece.
Hundreds
join demo for jailed charity workers Hundreds
of people marched through Cambridge city centre in support of jailed homeless
charity bosses Ruth Wyner and John Brock… …Wyner and Brock's solicitors
were refused leave to appeal against the convictions at the High Court
in London on Friday, but were allowed to appeal against sentence. Their
next step is to go to the Court of Appeal.
Who'll
be next? One man who has expressed concern about the extent of the drug problem in prisons is HM Chief Inspector, Sir David Ramsbotham, who said: "The people who cause the real misery in prisons are the drug dealers… …I hope that the Prison Service will declare war on the dealers and that prisons will make suitable arrangements for them." Such arrangements, post - Wintercomfort, are intriguing to contemplate, given the lengths to which the judge said the defendants in that case should have gone to prevent the offence of supply.
Living
agony for prison life for charity worker jailed for allowing homeless
to deal in drugs The
sentencing at Cambridge Crown Court last month has provoked uproar, with
thousands of people, including the local MP and university dignitaries
joining a campaign for their release… …Their conviction has stunned the
National Homeless Alliance, which said people with drugs problems would
now be turned away from homeless shelters. The Alliance also predicted
that head teachers and prison governors could become liable for drug dealing
on their premises.
Going Dutch? A Police Foundation report is about to recommend major changes to Britain's drugs laws. The government should respond without delay… …the zeal with which drugs offences are perused can depend on chance, or the policies of particular police forces. Two Cambridge care workers, charged with allowing their clients to deal in hard drugs in a day centre, were recently imprisoned for four and five years.
Doing
time for doing good The sentences were the final blow in a series of events that has left trustees and supporters reeling. Cambridgeshire police had been represented on the centre's advisory committee for at least a year, and had said nothing about the operation or that the police felt precautions were inadequate, says Padfield: (Nicky Padfield, lecturer in criminology and president of Fitzwilliam College) "The whole prosecution came out of the blue, because we thought we were working with all the agencies, including the police. That's what is so shocking about it."
Justice
for those who help the homeless? On
Friday December 17, 1999 two well respected people, Ruth Wyner and John
Brock, who have spent over twenty years working in the homeless sector,
were sent to prison, one for five years, and the other for four years,
for having knowingly permitted or suffered illegal heroin dealing on the
premises they managed, under section 8 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971…
Or on an alternative interpretation, for doing their job in good faith.
Why justice failed Brock and Wyner Drug
use and exchange is common and hard to control in NHS wards, in prisons,
in hospitals and specialists' services. The majority of senior staff in
these desperate settings at some time will have made Ruth Wyner's choice,
to impose sanctions but not to report infractions to the police.
Indeed
for many years it has been seen as good practice for agencies to maintain
strategic liaison with local police in return for which the police do
not harass them. This judgment unilaterally undermines future co-operation
between police and care services. The
imprisonment of Ruth Wyner and John Brock is a perversion. As a volunteer
manager with a church alliance emergency winter homeless shelter in the
United States, any of my colleagues could easily have landed in precisely
the same predicament at the bizarre but commonplace whims of our nation's
police and prosecutors. I
no longer believe that the US has the most ruthless drug warriors in the
Western World. Even your judges, like ours, are subject to political ambition
and lynch-mob mentality.
A
sentence too far for the judge who said too much As we reported last week, one of the many peculiar aspects of this disgraceful prosecution was that the judge said in public before the case was over that he was going to jail the charity workers because the desperate homeless had taken drugs in or near their Cambridge shelter.
Big Issues The trustees of Wintercomfort, who include two vicars and George Reid, bursar of St John's College and a former mayor of Cambridge, responded unequivocally saying: "we are absolutely shocked by this verdict which will have dire consequences for the whole of the homeless sector across the country and for every agency working with vulnerable people abusing heroin."
Jailed
for doing her job By the standards of what used to be conventional morality, Wyner and Brock were admirable people who had followed the instructions of Tony Blair and Louise Casey, his Homelessness Tsarina, and got beggars off the streets and in to Wintercomfort, an acclaimed network of refuges in Cambridge that supplied hot food, tea, washing machines, baths, GPs, advice on finding homes and jobs and, indeed, rehabilitation from drug addiction.
Fight
to free the charity chief jailed for 5 years A campaign has been launched to free a charity chief who was jailed for five years just before Christmas for refusing to betray the trust of drug victims. Ruth Wyner, 49 a mother of two, could also lose her family home after being convicted under laws aimed at heroin dealers.
A
poke in the blind eye Kevin
Flemen, senior project officer with Release, says the case has created
a lot of anxiety among staff working with vulnerable groups. "The message
from the authorities is that you must prevent supplying taking place,"
he says. "Doing your best is not good enough - you have to stop it. As
about 80% of this client group are using drugs that's no easy task, but
now clearly the stakes have been raised". |
|
|
|
|